No items found.
March 6, 2020
read-time

No-Code Twitter & Everyone Else: Why Change Management Is More Important Than Learning The Stack

Beyond the Stack: Managing Change with No-Code

I spend a lot of time on Twitter – too much really. Most of it is spent interacting with no-code folks, answering questions about Airtable, Zapier, Parabola, Memberstack and Webflow (the Ben Tossell stack as I'm calling it -- will keep that topic for for another day!). My boss thinks I'm an influencer, I see it more as support for makers (people I like interacting with!). Maybe it's both, I don't really care, I definitely enjoy answering so keep em' coming.

When I'm not on twitter though, I'm helping regular people trying to integrate "no-code" into their workflows. I put no-code between quotes not because I wish we had named our space of the internet differently but because how most people use no-code is not how we use no-code. No-code as a term (even more so the movement) is completely foreign to them. What they care about is their day-to-day: being more efficient, less work to manage work. It's through those conversations that I realized there's really two worlds to no-code: makers (on twitter) and what I'll call everyone else, for lack of better terms for both.

Most of the mentions I see on my twitter from makers are around understanding what's possible. Questions center around features and functionality: Airtable vs other tools, when to use Integromat vs Parabola vs Zapier and many other DMs I haven't yet made public. Mostly solo makers or small teams trying to go from A to B as quickly as possible, pushing the boundaries. Everyone on the team is onboard, adding new tools or new functionality is frictionless.

That's definitely not what I see outside of twitter, when everyone else reaches out. Discussions usually starts (via email) with a champion that falls in love with a tool (or a set of tools). They're usually not power users of the stack they've adopted but can already see that it's head and shoulders above their current way of working. They use, maybe, 10% of its functionality? When I come onboard as an "expert" the discussions do touch around the tool themselves but the bulk of it centers around change management. For that champion it's so obvious that whatever they've stitched together is better than what they have but how do they make that obvious to everyone else? How do they train their team on this new process and tool stack? Doing their job is hard enough, now they have to convince a group to change how they work (and convince IT, security, finance etc)? That sounds terrifying and exhausting.

In thinking about this, I was reminded of Camille Esposito's talk about bringing Webflow to Getaround which I think encapsulates this dichotomy quite elegantly. She wanted to increase the speed with which the marketing team could make changes to their website by migrating it from custom development to Webflow. To any visual developer (including her!) this seems like a no-brainer.

Of course your website should be built on Webflow!

To everyone else, it's not that clear. It's about getting multiple teams –including developers– onboard to that change. Convincing them that the marketing team reclaiming the website isn't going to have surprises down the line! Notice how little of the talk centers around "is Webflow the right tool" but instead around "here's why Webflow is good for us and you". It's not a 5 minute conversation either, but one that involved multiple meetings and many teams! Dealing with change, getting people onboard, understanding their worries and making sure those fears are considered and alleviated.

What I'm getting at here is that both of these worlds are crucial for visual developers. It's obvious important to know the tools in and out. This is where a lot of our world, on twitter, youtube and elsewhere, focuses on. It's necessary but not sufficient. What is even more important is helping your champions manage change. This is, I'm learning, much much more difficult than just knowing the tools. It requires empathy, deep understanding of their challenges and being their champion.

Anyone can learn the Webflow, Airtable, Memberstack, Zapier stack (thanks Makerpad) but what will differentiate the great visual developers from the pack is those that can help others get over their fear of change.

Best

Aron

Want to improve your workflows?
Join 2,000+ others who get the 10% better newsletter in their inbox every two weeks
One more step: check your inbox to verify your email!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Written by
Giovanni Segar
Share article
Written by
Aron Korenblit
Share article
Related posts
May 14, 2023
Are Managers To Blame For Bad Workflows? Yes And No.
Workflows
July 21, 2024
Why Workflow Documentation Is Useless (and What To Do Instead)
Workflows
May 14, 2023
You Don’t Understand Your Workflow
Workflows

Automate all the things

A weekly no-code automation delivered to your inbox (with thoughts on no-code every now and then)
Subscribe
Mar 06, 2020 by Aron Korenblit

No-Code Twitter & Everyone Else: Why Change Management Is More Important Than Learning The Stack

I spend a lot of time on Twitter – too much really. Most of it is spent interacting with no-code folks, answering questions about Airtable, Zapier, Parabola, Memberstack and Webflow (the Ben Tossell stack as I'm calling it -- will keep that topic for for another day!). My boss thinks I'm an influencer, I see it more as support for makers (people I like interacting with!). Maybe it's both, I don't really care, I definitely enjoy answering so keep em' coming.

When I'm not on twitter though, I'm helping regular people trying to integrate "no-code" into their workflows. I put no-code between quotes not because I wish we had named our space of the internet differently but because how most people use no-code is not how we use no-code. No-code as a term (even more so the movement) is completely foreign to them. What they care about is their day-to-day: being more efficient, less work to manage work. It's through those conversations that I realized there's really two worlds to no-code: makers (on twitter) and what I'll call everyone else, for lack of better terms for both.

Most of the mentions I see on my twitter from makers are around understanding what's possible. Questions center around features and functionality: Airtable vs other tools, when to use Integromat vs Parabola vs Zapier and many other DMs I haven't yet made public. Mostly solo makers or small teams trying to go from A to B as quickly as possible, pushing the boundaries. Everyone on the team is onboard, adding new tools or new functionality is frictionless.

That's definitely not what I see outside of twitter, when everyone else reaches out. Discussions usually starts (via email) with a champion that falls in love with a tool (or a set of tools). They're usually not power users of the stack they've adopted but can already see that it's head and shoulders above their current way of working. They use, maybe, 10% of its functionality? When I come onboard as an "expert" the discussions do touch around the tool themselves but the bulk of it centers around change management. For that champion it's so obvious that whatever they've stitched together is better than what they have but how do they make that obvious to everyone else? How do they train their team on this new process and tool stack? Doing their job is hard enough, now they have to convince a group to change how they work (and convince IT, security, finance etc)? That sounds terrifying and exhausting.

In thinking about this, I was reminded of Camille Esposito's talk about bringing Webflow to Getaround which I think encapsulates this dichotomy quite elegantly. She wanted to increase the speed with which the marketing team could make changes to their website by migrating it from custom development to Webflow. To any visual developer (including her!) this seems like a no-brainer.

Of course your website should be built on Webflow!

To everyone else, it's not that clear. It's about getting multiple teams –including developers– onboard to that change. Convincing them that the marketing team reclaiming the website isn't going to have surprises down the line! Notice how little of the talk centers around "is Webflow the right tool" but instead around "here's why Webflow is good for us and you". It's not a 5 minute conversation either, but one that involved multiple meetings and many teams! Dealing with change, getting people onboard, understanding their worries and making sure those fears are considered and alleviated.

What I'm getting at here is that both of these worlds are crucial for visual developers. It's obvious important to know the tools in and out. This is where a lot of our world, on twitter, youtube and elsewhere, focuses on. It's necessary but not sufficient. What is even more important is helping your champions manage change. This is, I'm learning, much much more difficult than just knowing the tools. It requires empathy, deep understanding of their challenges and being their champion.

Anyone can learn the Webflow, Airtable, Memberstack, Zapier stack (thanks Makerpad) but what will differentiate the great visual developers from the pack is those that can help others get over their fear of change.

Best

Aron

Automate All the Things
3K+
Subscribers
88
Issues
Enjoying the post? Get it in your inbox every Thursday
Last step: confirm your email!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Related streams

See all streams
No items found.